![]() ![]() In: International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, pp. Vosselman, G., Dijkman, S.: 3D Building Model Reconstruction from Point Clouds and Ground Planes. 579–588 (2003)ĭorninger, P., Pfeifer, N.: A Comprehensive Automated 3D Approach for Building Extraction, Reconstruction, and Regularization from Airborne Laser Scanning Point Clouds. In: Proceedings of the 2003 International Conference on Computational Science and its Applications, pp. You, S., Hu, J., Neumann, U., Fox, P.: Urban Site Modeling from LiDAR. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry & Remote Sensing 54, 153–163 (1999) Maas, H.-G., Vosselman, G.: Two Algorithms for Extracting Building Models from Raw Laser Altimetry Data. ![]() Hu, J., You, S., Neumann, U., Park, K.K.: Building Modeling from LiDAR and Aerial Imagery. International Archives of Photogrammetry & Remote Sensing 32, 339–346 (1998) Haala, N., Brenner, C., Anders, K.H.: 3D Urban GIS From Laser Altimeter And 2D Map Data. In: Daniilidis, K., Maragos, P., Paragios, N. Zhou, Q.-Y., Neumann, U.: 2.5D Dual Contouring: A Robust Approach to Creating Building Models from Aerial LiDAR Point Clouds. In: Photogrammetric Image Analysis, PIA 2007, Munich, Germany, September 19-21, vol. 36(33/W49A), pp. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 64, 575–584 (2009)īecker, S., Haala, N.: Refinement of Building Facades by Integrated Processing of LIDAR and Image Data. Pu, S., Vosselman, G.: Knowledge based reconstruction of building models from terrestrial laser scanning data. Kolbe, T.H., Nagel, C., Stadler, A.: CityGML-OGC standard for phtogrammetry? Photogrammetric Week, 265–277 (2009) ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 65, 570–580 (2010) Haala, N., Kada, M.: An Update on Automatic 3D Building Reconstruction. Processing bottlenecks of the proposed workflow for detailed 3D building reconstruction are also discussed. This paper proposes a workflow for creating detailed 3D building models with LoD3 from TLS data and uploading these models into Google Earth so that users can then explore the non-spatial business data of a building and its sub-components (e.g. To overcome this, geometrically accurate 3D building models are necessary to enable users to visualize, interact, and query for task specific non-spatial business data. ![]() As such, value-added applications developed for web-based and wireless platforms are limited to querying for available non-spatial business data at the building level only. However, current implementations of 3D city models are typically LoD2 that don’t include geometric or attribute details about many visible features (e.g. Since they are swappable the only limitation to how much imagery you can collect is how big your aircraft is to hold these units.Today’s spatially aware users are becoming more interested in retrieving personalised and task relevant information, requiring detailed 3D city models linked to non-spatial attribute data. The data units for the camera hold 1.7TB, enough for about 4,700 images. This thing is incredible, 216 mega-pixels with a panchromatic image size of 14,430 x 9,420 pixels, capturing data at over 3 GBits/sec, 13 CCD's - 7 pan and 4 color (RGB + Near IR) and 14 CPU's to process the raw images and data in real-time. Mark Brown, Senior Product Manager for Virtual Earth, describes the device by saying: Although the 3D models created for Virtual Earth come from more than just one source, the majority of the data comes from the large format digital aerial UltraCamX (UCX). It turns out that Microsoft manufacturers its own UltraCam to get the job done. How does Microsoft get those 3D models for Virtual Earth that make its Live Maps service so darn good? The answer is simple: if you want something done right, you have to do it yourself.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |